Saturday, February 15, 2020

Question 21 & 22 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Question 21 & 22 - Essay Example When an individual conducts an action such as abusing drugs and alcohol without being coerced into consumption of these substances, the act is recognized as voluntary and this leads the act is said to have conformed to the requirements of voluntary act (Singer, 2007, p.501). Actions that are caused due to the act of voluntary intoxication can not be defended through voluntary intoxication defense until and unless that act of intoxication has prevented the defendant from creating the intention of crime needed for a particular criminal act. If the defendant has committed an act that is regarded as reckless in nature, the defendant might even fail to gain the clause of imperfect defense (Delaney, 2004, p.423). For example: Before an individual drank a bottle of alcohol, a drug that results in the unconsciousness of the consumer is added to the bottle of alcohol. The individual consumes the drug mixed alcohol and enters into an unconscious state and in that unconscious state he/she ends up nearly killing another individual by beating him/her up. The individual is charged for assaulting another individual in such a manner that the other individual could have even experienced death. The individual may try to defend himself/herself from the charge by stating that she did not voluntarily consume the drug. But due to the fact that the individual voluntarily consumed alcohol and ended up in an unconscious state may make her defense weak because she had consumed alcohol knowingly and out of free will. This will lead to her being held responsible for beating another individual so badly that he/she nearly died. References Delaney, J. (2004). Learning criminal law as advocacy argument: Complete with exam problems & answers. Philadelphia, PA: J. Delaney Publications. Emanuel, S. (2007). Criminal law. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business/Aspen Publishers. Singer, R. G., La, F. J. Q., & Singer, R. G. (2007). Criminal law: Examples & explanations. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law & B usiness/Aspen Publishers. 2. An act is accepted as self defense when the defendant is able to justify that the act was conducted in self defense (Brody, 2010, p.133). Self defense can be used by the defendant in several issues such as physical attack, battery and homicides that are criminal in nature because all these acts include application of force. Most of the states consider self defense as defense of statutory but the position changes depending on the cases. Use of deadly force as a self defense is regarded as an action in which any level or kind of force is used and the usage of this force can result in the death of the person against whom it is being used. This does not mean that the person against whom the defense has been initiated should end up dead to consider this kind of act as application of deadly force. Example of application of deadly force includes utilization of a weapon such as knife or a gun to defend oneself. A defendant can use the concept of self defense as a defense that is both perfect and imperfect in nature. A defendant can claim that he has conducted an act in self defense when the applied force is considered as objectively reasonable under the scenario. According to law, an individual can conduct the application of

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Interpretive exercise Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Interpretive exercise - Assignment Example 2. Measure the width of the river to cross. What are the differences between the biblical audience and us? Bible has been segregated into two segments which are ‘Old Testament’ and ‘New Testament’. Old Testament describes the story of God’s treaty with Hebrew people. On the other hand, New Testament includes several versions of life, death and renaissance of Lord Jesus. ‘Measure the width of the river to cross’ is a New Testament passage relating to Bible. Here, river denotes something which can create differences in terms of diverse culture, customs, languages, time and power among others. Today, one obvious difference can be found between biblical audience and us. The difference is generational gap. Biblical audience was made up of first century and the present audience is made up of twenty first century who does not struggle with legalistic Judaism and traditional Gnosticism. The river which separates biblical audience and us is not wi de, but these differences should be addressed in order to cross the river1. 3. Cross the Principlizing Bridge. What are the theological principles in this text? Theological principles are generally intended for understanding the principles of God. The objective is to overwhelm the current gap between different religions and to demonstrate the mutual obligations of every religious discipline. In order to identify theological principles, one should recall the differences and similarities between present day’s audience and biblical audience. The theological principle of the text is that in order to be operative in serving God, people should employ their strength and bravery. The theological principles affirm that Christ provide the believers of God a kind of power in order to remain happy in variety of circumstances1. 4. Consult the biblical map. How does the theological principle fit with the rest of the Bible? The theological principles of the text are used by every Christian nowadays in terms of worship and divinity on Lord Jesus. The texts in Bible are precise, real and provide universal realities. In Bible, a particular passage can only be applied to certain circumstances. However, the theological principles revealed in the text are fit to each people who always have faith in God. Theological principles have certain definite meaning and application to the olden biblical audience and to the Christians in present days. As the theological principles possess explicit application and can be used by the audiences, it operates as a link for wrapping the river of differences2. 5. Grasp the text in our town. How should individual Christians today apply the theological principles? Individual Christians cannot apply the theological principles without knowing its significance. However, they can understand the main philosophy of Bible without implementing it in practical life. In order to apply the theological principles, initially there exists the need for observ ing the world, examining the cultural background of people and exploring the meaning of God’s word. There pertains huge dissimilarity between understanding the method of applying the theological principles and logically implementing them1. Assignment 17-1 The ‘Book of Revelation’ is the last volume of New Testament. Chapter 1 of the book defines John’s (one of the twelve supporters of Lord Jesus) explanations on seven stars of angels.